On the supply side
Political analysts and reporters keep talking about “trickle-up” and “trickle-down” economics. What do these terms mean? Personally, I’m interested only in “trickle to my pocket.” But as far as taxes are concerned, I pay what the government says to pay. They decide how to apply the money.
The current administration largely uses supply-side economics. In a phrase, money is applied to the top level of the economy, with the hope placed in the fairness of industry controllers that it will trickle down to the worker class.
Supply-side economics as an economic definition is a macroeconomic philosophy that holds that:
1. Lowering income taxes and capital gains tax rates will encourage the wealthy to invest in stock market companies. Wealthy would describe people in the higher tax brackets, who would benefit most from these tax breaks by gaining more disposable income.
2. These investments made by the wealthy (if they make the investments) will encourage businesses to expand and produce an increased supply of goods and services at lower prices.
3. That expansion in turn, will result in economic growth, increasing employment, disposable income for more workers, and demand for these goods.
Supply-siders feel that in a high tax rate environment, lowering taxes to the right level can raise revenue by causing faster economic growth.
This philosophy is also referred to as “trickle-down economics.”
· Proponents argue economic growth will flow downward from top to bottom, indirectly benefiting those workers who do not directly benefit from the tax changes.
· Opponents argue that “trickle-down” policies, if they work at all, provide a very slim benefit by the time they reach the worker, due to the benefits taken out at every level.
Advocates of the trickle-down effect believe that a free market, unrestrained by heavy taxation, regulation and other forms of government controls, will cause an increase in wealth for society as a whole, part of which will “trickle down” benefits from the wealthy to the worker class, increasing their standard of living.
Increasing taxes reduces trade between businesses and discourages investment like an international trade barrier or tariff, meant for that purpose.
Nixonomics
In 1971, Republican President Richard Nixon ended the the U.S. Gold standard, where the value of the U.S. dollar was pinned to the fixed value of gold. Almost immediately,commodity prices such as oil and gold, spiked up. Actually, the value of commodities remained constant while the dollar was devalued.
As a result, the stock market lost half of its value between the market peak of 1972 and its bottom in 1982, with investors seeking better returns in commodities and real estate.
Decreasing market investment caused companies to cut back, increasing unemployment. Unions influenced business owners to keep raising prices, fearing more wage hikes, causing inflation. Nixon refused to cut taxes since he said the incentive to invest in the market was zero. The result was a stagnant economy with high inflation, better known as stagflation.
Wage and price controls were put into effect, but interest rates were allowed to run free. The result was rapidly rising interest rates and tight credit. Inflation caused wage earners to creep into ever higher tax brackets, losing wage increases to taxes. The number of households able to afford mortgages diminished.
This was an example of supply-side economics gone bad. High taxes, high inflation and uncontrolled interest rates in a free market economy caused the economy to grind to a halt.
Reaganomics
Skip ahead to 1981 when Republican Ronald Reagan became President. Unemployment was at 7.5% and inflation was at 13.5%.
Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker squeezed inflation from the economic system, by raising the federal funds rate to 20%, forcing the prime interest rate up to 21.5%. This extremely tight monetary policy intentionally plunged the U.S. economy into a deep recession and wiped inflationary psychology and expectations out of the system.
Economist Robert Mundell convinced the President to reduce upper bracket and capital gains taxes to increase national output and tax revenue, and that would bring inflation under control.
The ensuing tax cuts, reducing taxes by $749 billion over five years, drew the country out of recession, and the tax receipt level quickly returned, then surpassed previous levels.
This was an example of supply-side and trickle-down economics that worked. After the economy was intentionally put into a coma, it was restored to health with lower unemployment levels and higher wages, as well as lower prices for consumers.
There are arguments whether the tax cuts actually paid for themselves in the Reagan era. Take away natural increases due to inflation, increased FICA taxes and corporate taxes, tax revenue in constant dollars decreased by $2.77 billion in that time period. And recouping $746 billion is not bad. But one thing is clear, that Reaganomics dramatically reversed the American economic decline of the 1970s.
Trickle-down supply-side economics is the model cherished by the Republican Party.
Shortcomings
The supply-side of the argument has its shortcomings. The conditions must be correct and the trickle-down stream must be entirely without blockages in order to work:
1. Taxes must be high enough that economic expansion is currently stifled.
2. The lowering of taxes must be noticeable enough to the wealthy that they will consider investing the extra money and not save it or spend it only on personal consumption.
3. The stock market must be attractive enough for the wealthy to consider investment there, as opposed to, for example, foreign investments, commodities (like oil), or real estate.
4. Stock market companies who receive the investment must, in turn, invest in expansion and increased employment, with the goal of increased production and lowering prices of their products.
5. The demand for the products must increase as production increases so the company still makes at least the same profit as before the expansion.
The economy must continue to expand, with people buying an increasing number of the lower cost product.
Supply-side economics proposes that production or supply is the key to economic prosperity and that consumption or demand is secondary.
In other words, supply will influence demand.
Bush-onomics
Skip ahead again to 2001, with our current President George W. Bush.
Bush inherited an unsteady economy from Democratic President Bill Clinton. Over the three quarters prior to March 31, 2001, the economy grew only at a 1.1% annualized rate. Much of this was credited to the bursting of the the dot-com bubble.
With threats of impending recession from Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Bush argued with Congress for a $1.35 trillion tax cut over ten years to stimulate the economy and create jobs. It was approved.
The early 2000s recession (which was not technically a recession) following the 1990s boom was not as bad as was predicted, but was still characterized by outsourcing followed by large layoffs, and recovery without strong employment growth.
Despite the resultant effects of the 2001 9/11 attacks, President Bush managed to keep the country out of recession.
Large numbers of economists were against the tax cuts, saying they will fail as a stimulus and “will worsen the long-term budget outlook … [and] generate further inequalities in after-tax income.” The President claimed the tax cuts paid for themselves through economic growth, but it took them until FY2006 to surpass the 2000 level and will take until 2011 to recover all the funds advanced.
Economist Arthur Laffer stood alone in stating that the tax cuts were “what was right,” because after the 9/11 attacks and threats of recession, the President “needed to stimulate the economy and spend for defense.”
Side note: Even with the tendency of the business cycle to produce periodic recessions, under Bush’s administration the length of time between recessions has extended to a record-breaking 17 years of sustained growth, in employment, personal income and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In addition, there were decreases in the government deficit for years 2005, 2006, and 2007. Deficits however, still add to the public debt.
The previous record between recessions was 11 years, 1958 – 1969.
The supply-side economics of the Bush administration shows that he acted prior to a recession taking hold.
1. Taxes were not stifling to business investors, even though the economy was struggling.
2. Tax cuts issued up to 2003 resulted in a 20% increase in income of the top 1% income households.
3. The stock market received a great deal of investment, rising nearly 32% from January 2001 (10,686) to October 2007 (14,093).
4. Production expanded, reducing unemployment from a high of 6.3% in 2003 to 4.4% in March 2007, with an average of 5.2%.
This was an example of supply-side and trickle-down economics that worked for seven years, prior to the ‘economic downturn.’ The President executed a preemptive strike and kept the nation out of recession for most of his two terms in office.
Recession of 2008
The economic downturn is a harsh reality of economic cycles. It is now up to our President elect to lead us back to prosperity.
This recession, started by the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble, leaves businesses with their expansions hanging like a stone around their necks with no customers and sharply reduced stock value.
But that is the subject of another post.
I agree with you on a lot of your unique views. You’ve written a great informational article that engaged me from the beginning. Thank you.
I recently read some articles that were so dull and off center that I couldn’t abide finishing them. Your article is not one of those articles. I like your content.
Your content is full of respectable information that is usable for today’s readers. I am impressed with your different points and how you present them so clearly. You’re very talented.
I don’t like informational articles usually, but your article is the exception to my rule. You have some very engaging and interesting content in this article. I think you make many original and fresh points.
I consider writing to be an art form. When I find a writer that can write quality content like this, I am amazed and delighted.
One of the top ten informative posts ever.
I really like this article. I think it’s full of useful and smart information and valid points with which I agree for the most part.
Ive got to say, the layout alone made me come back to this blog again. But now that Ive read what youve got to say, Ive got to share it with the world!
It’s become somewhat of a rarity to find original online article content anymore. I’m very surprised to find this well-written impressive article. You have many logical points here that compelled me to consider your side.
I like it! I like it a lot. You know exactly what youre talking about, exactly where other people are coming from on this issue. Im glad that I had the fortune to stumble across your blog. Its definitely an important issue that not enough people are talking about and Im glad that I got the chance to see all the angles.
Your writing style says a lot about who you are and in my opinion I’d have to say you’re insightful. This article reflects many of my own thoughts on this subject. You are truly unique.
When I started reading your article, I figured this would be the same old boring content I had been reading. I was completely wrong. Your article made this topic more clear in an interesting way.
There are valid points made here many of which I concur with completely. Some I will have consider, but this has really made me think.
What a great example of top quality article content. The article itself is very well-written, and contains great commentary that is able to hold your interest. Thanks for researching, planning and writing this great article.
This article is really well researched. I think this content is valuable information that you have written in a unique way. You’ve represented your views in an interesting, engaging way that makes your readers think.
Finally, an article with real substance on this subject! I am glad I found this material. Your a quality writer with unique talent and original thoughts. This is excellent work.
I am glad you chose to share your hard work with people like me. I’ve been looking for this information and until now I only found it confusing. Thank you.
You are a really motivational writer whether you intend to be or not. This article has inspired me to become more conscientious about my writing.
Your valuable writing skills are obvious in this article. I think the best thing about this content is that it’s full of interesting yet important information. This content is top-notch.
I just read your article while waiting for my flight and I’m impressed with your content. You have several bold and original ideas that I can relate to and respect.
What a great example of top quality article content. The article itself is very well-written, and contains great commentary that is able to hold your interest. Thanks for researching, planning and writing this great article.
Great job on this article. I haven’t read anything this thought-provoking in a long, long time. I agree with much of what you have stated. This is well laid out and written in my opinion.
I must think a lot like you, because your views and mine are similar. Your article created a lot brain activity for me. Thank you.
Your article is more than just information to me. To me, you have captured the reader’s attention with engaging and unique content. I like your original presentation of views and agree on many of them.
I truly appreciate you posting this work. I do look forward to more of this type of content as it is very engaging to read.
I have seen other articles on this subject before, however, they pale in comparison to the way this article was written. You have great insight.
I’m not sure of the last time I read content this engaging. I find this informative and yet also interesting and unique subject matter. I’m impressed with this writer’s presentation.
Rather than produce the same old content you have taken this subject to a whole new level . Kudos for not following the standard writing crowd.
I personally think your article is awesome! I am intrigued with much of your information and am persuaded to agree with you after reading your material. I’m hoping you’ll add more articles on this topic.
Hi webmaster, commenters and everybody else !!! The blog was absolutely fantastic! Lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need!b Keep ‘em coming… you all do such a great job at such Concepts… can’t tell you how much I, for one appreciate all you do!
The excellent use of the information unique to this subject compelled me to read further and delve deeper into research on this subject. Thank you.
You’ve provided me with very definitive information that I needed, but somehow is glossed over or purposely neglected. Your attention to this is greatly appreciated.
The content that I typically read online is nothing like what you have written in this article. Your work is obviously very well-researched, outlined and written. Please continue to write this kind of unique content.
This is the perfect combination of passion and superior material wrapped up into an easily understandable article. Truly a well-written, fact filled, fun article. My and I children loved it.
You have written an amazing article with many valid, unique points that are interesting and thought-provoking. It excites me to read informative content written by a writer who is so obviously knowledgeable in this area.
This article makes a lot of sense and I find it a refreshing change of pace from other articles. There are valid points with which I must agree and formatted them in a unique manner.
I am bookmarking your article so I can revisit and review more of your content. I agree with many of your thoughts and am impressed with your out-of-the box thinking.
I can’t thank you enough for the interesting points in this article. I am motivated to find out more and I hope you will soon be offering up more information.
This article proof that there are writers who really care about the quality of content they share. Thank you for being this kind of writer.
We just couldnt leave your website before saying that we really enjoyed the quality information you offer to your visitors… Will be back often to check up on new stuff you post!
I know there’s more to writing informational articles like this than typing some words. I get that you did a lot of work on this content. I think it’s impressive.
This article makes a lot of sense and I find it a refreshing change of pace from other articles. There are valid points with which I must agree and formatted them in a unique manner.
I chose to bookmark this site so I can come back and read it again. It’s extremely well-written and it draws you into the information provided. This is excellent writing.
I like it! I like it a lot. You know exactly what youre talking about, exactly where other people are coming from on this issue. Im glad that I had the fortune to stumble across your blog. Its definitely an important issue that not enough people are talking about and Im glad that I got the chance to see all the angles.
I believe I should warn you that you’re web site is looking stronge on my computer. I hope you can make it work as I can not view it currently. Abdullah77
Thank you for influencing so many readers with your great information. Your article has sparked a lot of thought for me. I share your views.
This is an excellent sample of good quality writing. You have made sound points with interesting content. This is really great work obviously written by a true talent! Thank you.
This article is a great example of good quality content. It’s a well-written, interesting article that
More often that not I read articles where the writer has not proofread their content. You either have a proofreader or you do it yourself because I couldn’t find a mistake in it. Great information.
Great article! I enjoyed this content and agree on many sound thoughts you have shared. Thank you for writing material that makes so much sense.