On July 20, 2010 a single Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted approval of Elena Kagan to be the fourth female associate justice ever to serve on the Supreme Court.
The vote was 13-6 with Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) breaking party ranks to vote approval. Senator Graham explained his approval vote:
“What’s in Elena Kagan’s heart is that of a good person who adopts a philosophy I disagree with,” Graham said. “She will serve this nation honorably, and it would not have been someone I would have chosen, but the person who did choose, President Obama, I think chose wisely.”
Elena Kagan has served as Obama’s Solicitor General, the highest-ranking trial lawyer in the country. She has had limited courtroom experience, but her greatest attributes were noted in an open endorsement letter from sixty-nine deans of law schools and includes an “understanding of both doctrine and policy” as well as her written record of legal analysis.
Kagan will be the third female associate justice currently serving on the Supreme Court and would be the first associate justice since 1972 without any prior bench time as a judge. The last justice with that experience record was William Rehnquist, who rose to spend 19 years as Chief Justice and administered the oath of office to three separate presidents (two of them twice).
Republicans fear that Kagan will put her political views and her liberal agenda ahead of the law. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said, “Ms. Kagan’s record shows that she supports an activist judicial philosophy, and that her personal and political views drive her legal views.”
Republicans were swift to declare their opposition to Kagan, more than they were with last year’s Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor. It comes at a time when November elections are drawing focus, and Republicans are working to polarize themselves from Democratic actions.
Conservative political groups pressured Republican senators to oppose Kagan’s nomination. The National Rifle Association (NRA) urged their campaign beneficiaries to vote “no” or stage a filibuster to block Kagan outright and threatened to downgrade contributions to Kagan supporters. This results from her time when she tried to block military recruiters from campus as Dean of the Harvard Law School.
Senator Graham was the only Republican to publicly announce he would vote to approve, although four other Republicans joined him crossing the party line for the full confirmation vote. Other than those few, Republicans marched in lock step to their party’s orders.
Graham’s decision to support Obama’s Supreme Court nominee makes it increasingly likely he will face a primary challenge by his own party when he’s up for re-election in 2014. South Carolina political gurus say the Senator’s support for Kagan “ensures he will face a serious primary challenge”
“It’s a tough political environment out there,” stated Graham.
It is indeed tough when Members of Congress are more interested in their own reelection than voting what’s best for the people who elected them, and blindly obeying orders to receive support in their next election.
~~~~~
On August 5, 2010, on the eve of the Congressional vacation, 36 GOP Senators and one Democrat — Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska – voted against the Supreme Court confirmation of Elena Kagan. Aside from the lockstep robot Republicans, five broke ranks to vote confirmation — Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Richard Lugar of Indiana and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.
Republican opponents spouted lame excuses for their ‘nay’ vote, like her opposition to military recruiters on the Harvard campus (when they were allowed access everywhere else), her opinion in a single case in her legal history, and her lack of courtroom experience as a judge.
The major reason shared by all who opposed her seemed to be the fear that she will use her own judgement in deciding issues. Those opponents need to read the U.S. Constitution; interpretation is why we have a Supreme Court.
They really fear that she will put her politics ahead of the law and be a rubber stamp for Obama’s agenda.
~~~~~
Similar treatment was given to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. She was only the second jurist to be nominated to three different judicial positions by three different presidents but was still voted against by Republicans.
See: Republicans against Obama nominee Sonia Sotomayor
I’m fascinated with the subject matter of your article. You’re a great writer with true insight. I enjoyed reading your views and appreciate your dedication to writing. Very interesting content.
How wonderful to read content that is so well-written, I was mesmerized by all of the information, as well as the way it was presented.
This is first prize, blue ribbon material you have written here. I haven’t had the pleasure of reading such interesting content in quite some time.
More writers today should concern themselves with creating unique content as much as you do. I’ve enjoyed your writing and the featured points of interest. Thank you.
A friend told me I needed to read this article, so here I am. I found this to be interesting and well-written. It’s very good.
I hope you always write because you do a great job with informational articles. Your use of solid content with original views is impressive. Thank you for your dedication to your readers and good writing.
Thank you for you engaging, informative material. I believe many of the views you have mentioned in your article are sound and unique. It’s obvious you are a talented writer.
Can we please stop thinking the one dimensional thinking
This article must have taken you a lot of research time. I am enthralled with your interesting content. I agree with many of your views. This is very good writing.
I have never seen such good content online before. You have really earned my deepest respect. I have shared this with my friends because it deserves to be seen. You are truly a good writer.
I don’t make it a habit to make comments on many articles, but this one deserves attention. I agree with the data you have written so eloquently here. Thank you.
I am back to go through more, continue to keep publishing.
It’s refreshing to read interesting content like this. Your unique writing style brings forth thought in the reader. I agree with a lot of this content. Thank you for writing this engaging and intelligent article.
This is awesome information! I have to thank you for providing so much insight into this subject. I am so happy I found your article.
A great article is as much about writing flair as it is about technicalities, but you have it all. It takes a great writer to have flair and and skill.
I’m glad I didn’t have to write this because it would be so confusing. You did a great job with this content and I agree.
Thank you for writing one of the best informational articles I’ve read in a long time. You make sound points that I can relate to and grasp. This is great!
This is so great that I had to comment. I’m usually just a lurker, taking in knowledge and nodding my head in quiet approval at the good stuff…..this required written props. Theory rocks…thanks.
Article writing can’t be easy for everyone, but you make it look like a piece of cake. I appreciate that you worked hard to make this information interesting and clear.