Rightfully yours

with Financial Command

Rightfully yours header image 2

Economic Picture: November 2009

December 4th, 2009 · 1,218 Comments- add yours

Report from the U.S. Department of Labor statistics:

Employment:

Nonfarm payroll employment virtually stopped in its tracks (down 11,000) after continuing the slowdown trend (111,000 [revised] in October, 139,000 [revised] in September, 201,000 in August [revised], 304,000 in July [revised], 467,000 in June, 345,000 in May, 539,000 in April and 633,000 in March).  

Since the start of the recession, payroll employment has decreased by 7.2 million, but November is the lowest number of jobs lost since the start of the recession.

The 3-month average job layoff figure has been improving steadily, and November’s figures break the trend.  August through October were 150,333 [revised]; July – September was 256,000; June – August was 324,000; May – July was 372,000; April – June was 450,333; March – May was 505,667.

The numbers still indicate that companies are approaching their maximum “leanness” and sustain perceptions that the economy gradually will swing to employment recovery.

The number of unemployed persons decreased in November by 325,000.  Previous month increases were October (558,000), September (214,000), August (466,000), July (267,000), June (218,000), May (787,000), April (563,000) and March (851,000). 

Total unemployment has risen to 15.4 million from 7.5 million (4.9%) in December 2007 and from 11.6 million (7.6%) in January 2009. 

The economy has lost 7.3 million jobs from December 2007 through September 2009, wiping out all the jobs created in the private sector over the last decade.

Unemployment is the highest since April 1983.  In a healthy economy, around 125,000 jobs a month must be added and filled just to keep the unemployment rate stable.

The current rate is 10.0% and the number unemployed is at 15.4 million

The number of persons working part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was little changed in November at 9.2 million.  Previous month part time figures were October (9.3 million), September (9.2 million), August (9.1 million), July (8.8 million) and June (9.0 million).  

These persons had their hours cut back or were unable to find full-time jobs.  Since the start of the recession, the number of such workers has increased by 4.4 million, and has remained relatively constant since March 2009. 

Long-term unemployed persons (jobless for 27 weeks and more) have tripled since the start of the recession to 5.9 million since December 2007, adding 293,0000 to that number in November.  One in three (38.3%) unemployed persons are in this category. 

The average length of unemployment has risen to more than 28 weeks, the longest on record since 1948.

There were 861,000 discouraged workers in November, up from 608,000 a year ago.  Discouraged workers are persons no longer looking for work.

Ed.Note: Note that the number unemployed dropped by 291,000 in November, contrasting with the 11,000-worker drop in payroll employment.  This accounts for workers dropping out of the Civilian labor force.  Coincidentally, this is the exact increase in long-term unemployed persons. 

The number unemployed (and the unemployment rate) includes only those who looked for work in the last 4 weeks, and changes as the Civilian labor force population varies. 

As consumer and business confidence improves, more workers will start to look for jobs again, returning to the workforce in anticipation of better employment conditions, which drives the unemployment rate higher.  On the other side, workers drop from the work force for a number of reasons including giving up looking for work.

Manufacturing jobs dropped 41,000 in November.  Previous month losses were October (61,000), September (51,000), August (63,000), July (52,000), June (136,000), May (156,000), April (149,000) and March (161,000) with widespread job losses totaling 2.1 million since December 2007, mostly in the durable goods industry. 

Construction jobs dropped by 27,000 in November.  Previous month losses were October (62,000), September (64,000), August (65,000), July (76,000), June (79,000), May (59,000), April (110,000), and March (161,000), with a total of 1.6 million since December 2007.  The average for May through October was 63,000 and 117,000 for the six months preceding that.   

Retail trade employment added 8,000 department store jobs as merchants geared up for the holiday season.  Previous month losses were October (40,000), September (39,000), August (9,600), July (44,000), June (18,000), and April (47,000). 

Education and health services continued to add jobs, with health care payrolls increasing by 21,000 in November.  Positive previous months were October (45,000), September (19,000), August (52,000), and July (21,000).  The health care industry has added 613,000 jobs since December 2007.

Professional and business services added 86,000 jobs in November, 52,000 of which were temporary jobs.  Previous changes were increases in October (18,000) and September (3,000), and losses in August (22,000), July (38,000), June (118,000), May (51,000), April (122,0000), and March (133,000). 

Government employment added 7,000 jobs in November, mostly teachers.  Previous changes were adds for October (46,000).  Losses were registered in September (53,000), August (18,000) and July (28,000).

Unemployment spreads stayed relatively the same with the highest among teenagers (26.7%), followed down by African-Americans, then Hispanics.  The lowest unemployment started with Asians (7.3%) followed up by Adult women (7.9%), Whites, then Adult men (10.5%). 

The good news from this data is that the job losses seem to be lessening.  It is perhaps due to fewer jobs available to lose, but the lower figures are an encouraging sign. 

The average manufacturing workweek rose by 0.3 hours to 40.4 hours with overtime rising tro 3.4 hours.  This figure closely correlates with overall output and gives clues (when workweek hours increase) on when firms will start hiring. 

Average hourly earnings (influenced by the recent increase in the legal minimum wage) edged up $0.01 to $18.74 for November, rising for a seventh straight month.  Over the past 12 months average hourly earnings have risen 2.2%.  

Workforce:

The total Civilian labor force stands at 153.9 million (down 98,000 from October).  There are a million fewer workers in the work force than in June (154.9 million).  

The Civilian labor force usually grows as a recession winds down and optimism about finding work grows.  But as long as Americans remain anxious about their jobs, consumer spending is not expected to grow enough to power an economic rebound. 

The employment population ratio, at 58.5 percent, has declined by 4.2 percent since the recession began in December 2007.

Comparing now with the final month of the last major downturn in November 1982, the total Civilian labor force then stood at 111.1 million.  In that month, there were 11.9 million people unemployed accounting for 10.8% of the available work force (average for the year was 10.6 million unemployed with the rate at 9.7%). 

Looking at jobs needed to reduce unemployment
with the total Civilian labor force at 153.9 million:

Rate%_ Unemployed    
10.2 15.7 million   October
10.0 15.4 million   <=we are here
9.8 15.1 million   September
9.7 14.9 million   August
9.5 14.7 million   June 
9.4 14.46 million    May,July
8.9 13.7 million    April
8.5 13.2 million    March
8.1 12.5 million    February
7.6 11.7million    January
7.0 10.7million    
6.5 10.0 million    
6.0 _9.2 million    
5.5 _8.5 million   <= target
5.0 _7.7 million    
4.5 _6.9 million    

.
To restore employment to the 5.5% level of 2008, about 6.9 million people will have to regain their job or start new jobs.  It is a tall mountain to climb. 

Ed.Note:  Government and economists foretell that the “normal” unemployment rate will move up to 8% from its current 5.5% level.  With the current Civilian labor force, that means that on a permanent basis there will be roughly 12.5 million people unemployed — more than 4 million more than at the “normal” level today. 

Data collection:

The Census Bureau surveys 60,000 households across the country to insure an accurate demographic survey.  This translates into about 110,000 individuals.  All the counties and county-equivalent cities are grouped into 2,025 geographic sampling units.  824 of these units are selected to accurately represent the entire population of the United States.  For a detailed explanation, see the BLS Handbook of Methods

Each month, one-fourth of the interviewed households are rotated out.  They rejoin the sample after eight months, are interviewed for another four months, and then are rotated out forever. 

Each month, 2,200 highly trained Census Bureau employees conduct interviews in the sample households for information on labor force activities (job holding and job seeking) or non-labor force status of household members. 

This sampling method results in a 90+ percent probability that the results will be within 290,000 of the 160 million people in the Civilian labor force.  A monthly total census would be cost-prohibitive. 

Questions are specifically formulated so that neither the interviewer nor the persons interviewed decide their labor force classification.  This prevents the sample from being distorted by respondents providing answers based on their opinion or what a “right” answer should be. 

The basic concepts of employment are: 
1.      People with jobs are employed
2.      People who are jobless, looking for jobs and available for work are unemployed. 
3.      The sum of people employed or unemployed constitute the Civilian labor force. 
4.      People who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the Civilian labor force. 
5.      People who are either institutionalized in a facility (correctional, residential nursing or mental health) or on active duty with the Armed Forces are not counted. 

The unemployment rates are extrapolated from the survey results. 

The quoted unemployment rate excludes people who have stopped looking for work because they believe no jobs are available (discouraged workers) and others outside the labor force.  They are counted separately. 

Their number has nearly doubled in the previous 12 months.

 Stimulus (Recovery Act):

The president credits his $787 billion stimulus package of tax cuts and increased government spending with improving employment.   He hopes to create about 3.5 million jobs.  Lower estimates put that figure at 2 to 2.5 million jobs by the end of 2010, reducing the unemployment rate to 8+%. 

The Fed’s record-low interest rates, along with other moves to drive down loan rates and stimulate borrowing, have supported the economic rebound.

The White House Council of Economic Advisers released a report showing the plan would save or create 1.5 million jobs by the end of 2009 and 3.5 million by the end of 2010. 

A senior White House official stated that the Obama administration’s fiscal stimulus plan will meet their previous estimates to save 3.5 million U.S. jobs by the end of 2010, but the unemployment rate at that time may be higher due to further deterioration in the economy.  White House officials have been careful to point out that estimated jobs created and saved have merely slowed continued job losses.

The president is now drafting a proposal to try to stimulate more hiring.  Obama plans to send Congress a list of ideas, including new tax breaks for small businesses that hire, some new spending on roads, bridges and other construction and grants to state and local governments to avoid layoffs.  Congress is not likely to take up a job-creation package until after New Year’s.

***Stimulus spending by state: 

As of December 1, 2009, of the
$
326,663,100,776 announced
$300,523,356,139 (92.0%) has been made available
$145,134,241,664 (44.43%) has been paid out to the states

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=homeMap

 Recession histories:

With Nov 1982 unemployment at 10.2%, and the government taking aggressive action, it was still more than five years (April 1988) from the peak before unemployment receded to 5.4%. 

The approach that time, however, was to fix the economy at the expense of the worker.

Some compare the fall in employment to 1974-1975 and 1981-1982. If the comparison is accurate, the peak in unemployment may be reached within the next four to five months (past performance is no guarantee of the future).

Economist William Polley made a chart that included every recession since World War II.  It makes the chart pretty hard to read, so he simplified it with selected post-WWII recessions.

William Polley’s chart shows how the recovery from the 2001 recession took four years for employment to return to its February 2001 peak. 

Using the Department of Labor unemployment tables of unemployment rates and 5.5% as the “normal” rate of unemployment, I have analyzed things a little differently.  Of course, along the way, the Civilian labor force increases, so the percentages represent ever more workers.

The following table shows unemployment start dates, peaks and returns to the normal rate of 5.5%, Civilian labor force in millions of workers for that year, and the lengths of times from the start date in months:

 Recession peaks 1974-2009 

    Millions   Pct Labor Growth Recession Period
    Unemployed     Force   Length
Start July 1974     5.5 91.9    
Peak May 1975 8.4   9.0     10 mos
Return May 1979     5.6 104.9 14.1% 4 yrs 10 mos
Start May 1979     5.6 104.9    
Peak Nov 1982 11.9   10.8     3 yrs 6 mos
Return Apr 1988     5.4 121.6 15.9% 8 yrs 11 mos
Start Nov 1990     6.2 125.8    
Peak May 1992 9.7   7.6     18 mos
Return Dec 1994     5.5 131.0 4.1% 4 yrs 1 mo
Start Nov 2001     5.5 143.7    
Peak June 2003 9.2   6.3     19 mos
Return Feb 2004     5.6 146.5 1.9% 2 yrs 3 mos
Start May 2008     5.5 154.7    
Peak Nov 2009 15.4   10.0     19 mos
Return         153.9   So far

Note that the unemployment peak period that started in 1974 and ended in 1979 (lasting nearly five years) was followed immediately by another peak period ending nearly nine years later.  By the end of that period, the work force had increased by more than 32%, meaning overall, almost 30 million new jobs had to be created.

 The aggressive increase in the Civilian labor force in that period can likely be attributed to post-World War II babies reaching adulthood, with some entering the labor force after secondary school and the rest entering the workforce after further education.

The periods from 1988 to 1990 and 1995 to 2008 were periods of prosperity, with low unemployment (but a building bubble). Here is the same data in graphic form:

Unemployment rates:
Unemployment rates 1970-2008
It is interesting to recognize that in most cases, unemployment peaks roughly one-third of the timeline for unemployment to return to its “normal” rate, so we can double the number of months from the Start to the Peak to expect to arrive at an approximate return to “normal.”We live in hope (again, past performance is no guarantee of the future).

The next Economic Jobs report will be found at:
Economic Picture: December 2009

The last Economic Jobs report will be found at:
Economic Picture: October 2009

Share

Tags: ·································

1,218 Comments so far - add yours ↓

  • da

    Many people have tried to explain this idea and have failed miserably. I am glad someone has stepped forth and claimed first place and been able to rectify that situation.

  • the seo expert

    This is a simply smashing piece of writing. I think the points you make are not only valid but truly well-presented. Thank you so much.

  • natural calming remedies for children

    I enjoy a good informative article like this one. The points made are original. I share many of the views of this writer. Thank you.

  • long black cardigan

    There’s a lot of information here to take in from one read through, but I’m enjoying how much this content is challenging my thought processes.

  • garmin forerunner 405 review

    This article is certainly well-written. This is a rare instance these days. This writer really has the information together in this article and is on the ball. I share the fresh views of this writer.

  • australian deal websites

    I know when I’m reading quality content when I can’t stop. I got involved in this article and missed my lunch. It was worth it.

  • internet gambling

    I found your page and my computer shut down after a “critical update.” Thankfully, I remembered the title and came right back to it. I enjoyed reading your great article.

  • gas mask

    I’ve really enjoyed reading and reviewing the points in your well-written content. Thank you for presenting this useful information in an interesting and understandable format.

  • amberen

    I don’t often get to read much online, but I’m glad to have found this article. You are a unique writer with a special flair.

  • nyhetsbrev program

    This is a great piece of quality writing. I feel the points contained here are not only valid but extremely well-worded. Thank you so much.

  • lg 42 plasma

    It’s seems to be getting harder and harder to find good reading material online. Your article has renewed my faith in today’s writers. Thank you.

  • internet providers

    This one article alone shows off your excellent writing skills. I am very impressed with your views and interesting content. I hope you intend to continue writing more informational articles.

  • best blood pressure monitor reviews

    It’s refreshing to read well-written informational content like this. I’ve read many other articles on this topic only to be disappointed in the content. You should be proud that you’re influencing the opinions of others.

  • home renovation

    This post really made me think.

  • ships models

    This is just the quality of writing I like to read. I like how well this has obviously been researched. The main points are tangible, interesting and well thought out. This is really good reading.

  • best paleo recipes

    I just want to say I love your article. This information is useful to me and you made it interesting to read. Really good job!

  • rbc web banking

    This is a great informational article! I enjoyed reading this material. Thank you for putting a unique spin on this topic and giving me more factors to consider. I like your views and your style.

  • Fausto Donchez

    Many years ago, I taught high school english. I have long since retired, but I still like to show my appreciation for good quality writing.

  • buy new car online

    Now this is highly recommeded post for me. I will surely email this to my friend.

  • ellipticalmachinereviews

    This is very interesting data. You have managed to make this very sensible. I like how you make your points in such a different way.

  • car racing games

    Typically, I find information like this uninteresting, but your content is interesting to me. You engaged me and made me really think about this content. I really enjoyed this article.

  • jersey shore season 1

    If more people that write articles really concerned themselves with writing great content like you, more readers would be interested in their writings. Thank you for caring about your content.

  • Mobile Phone Accessories

    Completely understand what your stance in this matter. Although I would disagree on some of the finer details

  • video classified ads

    I simply must tell you that you have written an excellent and unique article that I really enjoyed reading. I’m fascinated by how well you laid out your material and presented your views. Thank you.

  • versace bright crystal perfume

    Thank you for writing informative content. I’m impressed with your ability to write persuasive material. You’ve given me a lot of thought-provoking views to consider.

  • Hotel San Francisco

    You raise many queries in my thoughts; you wrote an excellent article, but this articlee is also thought provoking, and I am going to need to ponder it a bit more; I will be back soon.

  • blue nile diamonds

    I started reading your article and couldn’t stop. You are great with words and making your views interesting and compelling. I am glad I got to read it. Thank you.

  • brazilian bikini

    Your talent really comes out in your article. There’s a lot of information that hits close to home for me. I agree with a lot of your content. You have a real knack for writing.

  • 名刺作成

    i seemed to be and so astounded as i changed online business business card model, product sales has become greater through 122%

  • Wood Burning Cook Stoves

    I really appreciate your posting of this article. I look forward to more content of this type from you as it is very interesting reading. Your writing skills are exemplary.

  • aloe vera products

    I must think a lot like you, because your views and mine are similar. Your article created a lot brain activity for me. Thank you.

  • Drake Institute Reviews

    You have created an interesting article. Unique is a word I could use to describe your writing. You are an accomplished writer with a good grasp of the English language.

  • Wool Rugs

    I’m not usually entertained by informational material, but this article is so interesting I was enthralled. Engaging articles with informative content are more educational than boring technical garb. I really think this is excellent content.

  • Weight Loss

    These days, it’s not easy to find unique and original articles, especially on informational content. This article is all that; unique, original and informative. Thanks for working hard to write original material for this topic.

  • I need money

    Your writing is impressive, informative and compelling. I was motivated to read your article twice due to the vast information and interesting content. Thank you.

  • plasma or led

    What can I say about this article? You have done a bang up job of making your points clear and I agree with you on most. I enjoyed this reading.

  • internet marketing nz

    I must give this content a top rating. This is well-written and beneficial content you just don’t see in often these days. Thanks for sharing.

  • xango review

    Thanks for all this information. I think you make very valid points and I appreciate them and agree with you. You’ve done a great job with expressing yourself in words.

  • kratom seeds

    I’m not a professional writer, but I do enjoy reading great content like this. Thank you for providing such vital information in a presentable way.

  • home business

    It’s truly an honor to be subjected to thoughtful and unbiased writing like this. The writer is clearly knowledgeable and balanced in my humble opinion.

  • code avantage Sarenza

    You have really made me think with this material. You’re writing style as well as your writing skill is excellent. I enjoyed reading your article and hope to read more.

  • radiowerbung

    I find that sometimes I have to struggle to decipher just what a writer is trying to say, but you have made your information clear.

  • WoW Gathering Bot

    I am very glad this content was available. It’s very thought provoking, informative and easy to read and understand. I know this information will be very helpful in the future.

  • Nose Right Review

    You’ve taken alternating views and combined them into an interesting article. More articles on this subject need to be written by you as you appear to be astute and insightful.

  • eat to stay healthy

    Good job on this article! I really like how you presented your facts and how you made it interesting and easy to understand. Thank you.

  • teak hardwood flooring

    One of the more impressive blogs Ive seen. Thanks so much for keeping the internet classy for a change. Youve got style, class, bravado. I mean it. Please keep it up because without the internet is definitely lacking in intelligence.

  • Naples Real Estate

    Your article is a good example of the kind of writing I love to read. It’s the kind of thought-provoking content that allows you to use your brain. Thank you.

  • Valoraciones MasterD

    I like how this article is written. Your points are sound, original, fresh and interesting. This information has been made so clear there’s no way to misunderstand it. Thank you.

  • Best Selling Tea

    Writing isn’t an easy task for everyone, but you make it look easy Every point you have made here is well written and informative. I concur with your thoughts here.

  • youtube

    This article is outstanding, informative and most interesting. I have thoroughly enjoyed taking in the points of interest and I agree with you on most. Thank you for caring enough to make your content interesting.