Report from the U.S. Department of Labor statistics:
Nonfarm payroll employment virtually stopped in its tracks (down 11,000) after continuing the slowdown trend (111,000 [revised] in October, 139,000 [revised] in September, 201,000 in August [revised], 304,000 in July [revised], 467,000 in June, 345,000 in May, 539,000 in April and 633,000 in March).
Since the start of the recession, payroll employment has decreased by 7.2 million, but November is the lowest number of jobs lost since the start of the recession.
The 3-month average job layoff figure has been improving steadily, and November’s figures break the trend. August through October were 150,333 [revised]; July – September was 256,000; June – August was 324,000; May – July was 372,000; April – June was 450,333; March – May was 505,667.
The numbers still indicate that companies are approaching their maximum “leanness” and sustain perceptions that the economy gradually will swing to employment recovery.
The number of unemployed persons decreased in November by 325,000. Previous month increases were October (558,000), September (214,000), August (466,000), July (267,000), June (218,000), May (787,000), April (563,000) and March (851,000).
Total unemployment has risen to 15.4 million from 7.5 million (4.9%) in December 2007 and from 11.6 million (7.6%) in January 2009.
The economy has lost 7.3 million jobs from December 2007 through September 2009, wiping out all the jobs created in the private sector over the last decade.
Unemployment is the highest since April 1983. In a healthy economy, around 125,000 jobs a month must be added and filled just to keep the unemployment rate stable.
The current rate is 10.0% and the number unemployed is at 15.4 million.
The number of persons working part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was little changed in November at 9.2 million. Previous month part time figures were October (9.3 million), September (9.2 million), August (9.1 million), July (8.8 million) and June (9.0 million).
These persons had their hours cut back or were unable to find full-time jobs. Since the start of the recession, the number of such workers has increased by 4.4 million, and has remained relatively constant since March 2009.
Long-term unemployed persons (jobless for 27 weeks and more) have tripled since the start of the recession to 5.9 million since December 2007, adding 293,0000 to that number in November. One in three (38.3%) unemployed persons are in this category.
The average length of unemployment has risen to more than 28 weeks, the longest on record since 1948.
There were 861,000 discouraged workers in November, up from 608,000 a year ago. Discouraged workers are persons no longer looking for work.
Ed.Note: Note that the number unemployed dropped by 291,000 in November, contrasting with the 11,000-worker drop in payroll employment. This accounts for workers dropping out of the Civilian labor force. Coincidentally, this is the exact increase in long-term unemployed persons.
The number unemployed (and the unemployment rate) includes only those who looked for work in the last 4 weeks, and changes as the Civilian labor force population varies.
As consumer and business confidence improves, more workers will start to look for jobs again, returning to the workforce in anticipation of better employment conditions, which drives the unemployment rate higher. On the other side, workers drop from the work force for a number of reasons including giving up looking for work.
Manufacturing jobs dropped 41,000 in November. Previous month losses were October (61,000), September (51,000), August (63,000), July (52,000), June (136,000), May (156,000), April (149,000) and March (161,000) with widespread job losses totaling 2.1 million since December 2007, mostly in the durable goods industry.
Construction jobs dropped by 27,000 in November. Previous month losses were October (62,000), September (64,000), August (65,000), July (76,000), June (79,000), May (59,000), April (110,000), and March (161,000), with a total of 1.6 million since December 2007. The average for May through October was 63,000 and 117,000 for the six months preceding that.
Retail trade employment added 8,000 department store jobs as merchants geared up for the holiday season. Previous month losses were October (40,000), September (39,000), August (9,600), July (44,000), June (18,000), and April (47,000).
Education and health services continued to add jobs, with health care payrolls increasing by 21,000 in November. Positive previous months were October (45,000), September (19,000), August (52,000), and July (21,000). The health care industry has added 613,000 jobs since December 2007.
Professional and business services added 86,000 jobs in November, 52,000 of which were temporary jobs. Previous changes were increases in October (18,000) and September (3,000), and losses in August (22,000), July (38,000), June (118,000), May (51,000), April (122,0000), and March (133,000).
Government employment added 7,000 jobs in November, mostly teachers. Previous changes were adds for October (46,000). Losses were registered in September (53,000), August (18,000) and July (28,000).
Unemployment spreads stayed relatively the same with the highest among teenagers (26.7%), followed down by African-Americans, then Hispanics. The lowest unemployment started with Asians (7.3%) followed up by Adult women (7.9%), Whites, then Adult men (10.5%).
The good news from this data is that the job losses seem to be lessening. It is perhaps due to fewer jobs available to lose, but the lower figures are an encouraging sign.
The average manufacturing workweek rose by 0.3 hours to 40.4 hours with overtime rising tro 3.4 hours. This figure closely correlates with overall output and gives clues (when workweek hours increase) on when firms will start hiring.
Average hourly earnings (influenced by the recent increase in the legal minimum wage) edged up $0.01 to $18.74 for November, rising for a seventh straight month. Over the past 12 months average hourly earnings have risen 2.2%.
Workforce:
The total Civilian labor force stands at 153.9 million (down 98,000 from October). There are a million fewer workers in the work force than in June (154.9 million).
The Civilian labor force usually grows as a recession winds down and optimism about finding work grows. But as long as Americans remain anxious about their jobs, consumer spending is not expected to grow enough to power an economic rebound.
The employment population ratio, at 58.5 percent, has declined by 4.2 percent since the recession began in December 2007.
Comparing now with the final month of the last major downturn in November 1982, the total Civilian labor force then stood at 111.1 million. In that month, there were 11.9 million people unemployed accounting for 10.8% of the available work force (average for the year was 10.6 million unemployed with the rate at 9.7%).
Looking at jobs needed to reduce unemployment
with the total Civilian labor force at 153.9 million:
| Rate%_ | Unemployed | ||
| 10.2 | 15.7 million | October | |
| 10.0 | 15.4 million | <=we are here | |
| 9.8 | 15.1 million | September | |
| 9.7 | 14.9 million | August | |
| 9.5 | 14.7 million | June | |
| 9.4 | 14.46 million | May,July | |
| 8.9 | 13.7 million | April | |
| 8.5 | 13.2 million | March | |
| 8.1 | 12.5 million | February | |
| 7.6 | 11.7million | January | |
| 7.0 | 10.7million | ||
| 6.5 | 10.0 million | ||
| 6.0 | _9.2 million | ||
| 5.5 | _8.5 million | <= target | |
| 5.0 | _7.7 million | ||
| 4.5 | _6.9 million |
.
To restore employment to the 5.5% level of 2008, about 6.9 million people will have to regain their job or start new jobs. It is a tall mountain to climb.
Ed.Note: Government and economists foretell that the “normal” unemployment rate will move up to 8% from its current 5.5% level. With the current Civilian labor force, that means that on a permanent basis there will be roughly 12.5 million people unemployed — more than 4 million more than at the “normal” level today.
Data collection:
The Census Bureau surveys 60,000 households across the country to insure an accurate demographic survey. This translates into about 110,000 individuals. All the counties and county-equivalent cities are grouped into 2,025 geographic sampling units. 824 of these units are selected to accurately represent the entire population of the United States. For a detailed explanation, see the BLS Handbook of Methods.
Each month, one-fourth of the interviewed households are rotated out. They rejoin the sample after eight months, are interviewed for another four months, and then are rotated out forever.
Each month, 2,200 highly trained Census Bureau employees conduct interviews in the sample households for information on labor force activities (job holding and job seeking) or non-labor force status of household members.
This sampling method results in a 90+ percent probability that the results will be within 290,000 of the 160 million people in the Civilian labor force. A monthly total census would be cost-prohibitive.
Questions are specifically formulated so that neither the interviewer nor the persons interviewed decide their labor force classification. This prevents the sample from being distorted by respondents providing answers based on their opinion or what a “right” answer should be.
The basic concepts of employment are:
1. People with jobs are employed
2. People who are jobless, looking for jobs and available for work are unemployed.
3. The sum of people employed or unemployed constitute the Civilian labor force.
4. People who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the Civilian labor force.
5. People who are either institutionalized in a facility (correctional, residential nursing or mental health) or on active duty with the Armed Forces are not counted.
The unemployment rates are extrapolated from the survey results.
The quoted unemployment rate excludes people who have stopped looking for work because they believe no jobs are available (discouraged workers) and others outside the labor force. They are counted separately.
Their number has nearly doubled in the previous 12 months.
Stimulus (Recovery Act):
The president credits his $787 billion stimulus package of tax cuts and increased government spending with improving employment. He hopes to create about 3.5 million jobs. Lower estimates put that figure at 2 to 2.5 million jobs by the end of 2010, reducing the unemployment rate to 8+%.
The Fed’s record-low interest rates, along with other moves to drive down loan rates and stimulate borrowing, have supported the economic rebound.
The White House Council of Economic Advisers released a report showing the plan would save or create 1.5 million jobs by the end of 2009 and 3.5 million by the end of 2010.
A senior White House official stated that the Obama administration’s fiscal stimulus plan will meet their previous estimates to save 3.5 million U.S. jobs by the end of 2010, but the unemployment rate at that time may be higher due to further deterioration in the economy. White House officials have been careful to point out that estimated jobs created and saved have merely slowed continued job losses.
The president is now drafting a proposal to try to stimulate more hiring. Obama plans to send Congress a list of ideas, including new tax breaks for small businesses that hire, some new spending on roads, bridges and other construction and grants to state and local governments to avoid layoffs. Congress is not likely to take up a job-creation package until after New Year’s.
***Stimulus spending by state:
As of December 1, 2009, of the
$326,663,100,776 announced
$300,523,356,139 (92.0%) has been made available
$145,134,241,664 (44.43%) has been paid out to the states
http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=homeMap
Recession histories:
With Nov 1982 unemployment at 10.2%, and the government taking aggressive action, it was still more than five years (April 1988) from the peak before unemployment receded to 5.4%.
The approach that time, however, was to fix the economy at the expense of the worker.
Some compare the fall in employment to 1974-1975 and 1981-1982. If the comparison is accurate, the peak in unemployment may be reached within the next four to five months (past performance is no guarantee of the future).
Economist William Polley made a chart that included every recession since World War II. It makes the chart pretty hard to read, so he simplified it with selected post-WWII recessions.
William Polley’s chart shows how the recovery from the 2001 recession took four years for employment to return to its February 2001 peak.
Using the Department of Labor unemployment tables of unemployment rates and 5.5% as the “normal” rate of unemployment, I have analyzed things a little differently. Of course, along the way, the Civilian labor force increases, so the percentages represent ever more workers.
The following table shows unemployment start dates, peaks and returns to the normal rate of 5.5%, Civilian labor force in millions of workers for that year, and the lengths of times from the start date in months:
Recession peaks 1974-2009
| Millions | Pct | Labor | Growth | Recession Period | |||
| Unemployed | Force | Length | |||||
| Start | July 1974 | 5.5 | 91.9 | ||||
| Peak | May 1975 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 10 mos | |||
| Return | May 1979 | 5.6 | 104.9 | 14.1% | 4 yrs 10 mos | ||
| Start | May 1979 | 5.6 | 104.9 | ||||
| Peak | Nov 1982 | 11.9 | 10.8 | 3 yrs 6 mos | |||
| Return | Apr 1988 | 5.4 | 121.6 | 15.9% | 8 yrs 11 mos | ||
| Start | Nov 1990 | 6.2 | 125.8 | ||||
| Peak | May 1992 | 9.7 | 7.6 | 18 mos | |||
| Return | Dec 1994 | 5.5 | 131.0 | 4.1% | 4 yrs 1 mo | ||
| Start | Nov 2001 | 5.5 | 143.7 | ||||
| Peak | June 2003 | 9.2 | 6.3 | 19 mos | |||
| Return | Feb 2004 | 5.6 | 146.5 | 1.9% | 2 yrs 3 mos | ||
| Start | May 2008 | 5.5 | 154.7 | ||||
| Peak | Nov 2009 | 15.4 | 10.0 | 19 mos | |||
| Return | 153.9 | So far |
Note that the unemployment peak period that started in 1974 and ended in 1979 (lasting nearly five years) was followed immediately by another peak period ending nearly nine years later. By the end of that period, the work force had increased by more than 32%, meaning overall, almost 30 million new jobs had to be created.
The aggressive increase in the Civilian labor force in that period can likely be attributed to post-World War II babies reaching adulthood, with some entering the labor force after secondary school and the rest entering the workforce after further education.
The periods from 1988 to 1990 and 1995 to 2008 were periods of prosperity, with low unemployment (but a building bubble). Here is the same data in graphic form:
Unemployment rates:

It is interesting to recognize that in most cases, unemployment peaks roughly one-third of the timeline for unemployment to return to its “normal” rate, so we can double the number of months from the Start to the Peak to expect to arrive at an approximate return to “normal.”We live in hope (again, past performance is no guarantee of the future).
The next Economic Jobs report will be found at:
Economic Picture: December 2009
The last Economic Jobs report will be found at:
Economic Picture: October 2009
I would be interested in other articles you have written. Your views in this content has sparked my curiosity and I think a lot like you. I will keep coming back for more great information.
You are utterly correct on that!
I’ve never seen such great work on this topic. The quality of this work is very high and you are talented at what you do. Please continue these writings. Thanks!
I wish I had a dime for every bad article I’ve read lately. I also wish other writers had your talent and style. Thank you.
You’ve brought up some really great points. I think you have a lot of vision and I can understand how you think. Really great writing.
I am glad you take pride in what you write. This makes you stand way out from many other writers that push poorly written content.
I’ve read a lot of online articles on this topic lately. Yours is the only one that really made sense to me. Thanks a bunch.
I added this to my favorites menu. I want to take another look later. I agree on many points made in this article, but I would like to take time to think about some aspects.
Impressive informational writing is somewhat of an oxymoron. Your article is the exception to this rule. I haven’t been so engaged in this kind of content in a long, long time. Thanks for this information.
This article contains some of the most informative content I’ve read in quite some time. The points of this content are clear-cut and engaging. I think much like this writer.
I think you have vision. This is awesome content. I’m impressed with how you presented it. I plan to return in hopes to read more.
I could go on and on about how great your article is, but I’d rather tell you I appreciate your dedication to writing quality content. It’s seldom I see writers care this much. Thank you.
If you set out to make me think today; mission accomplished! I really like your writing style and how you express your ideas. Thank you.
I would be interested in other articles you have written. Your views in this content has sparked my curiosity and I think a lot like you. I will keep coming back for more great information.
This is really excellent reading material! I agree with much of the views you express in your article. I am impressed with your style of writing and how uniquely you wrote this content. Thank you.
It’s encouraging to see writing like this online. I respect the work you do and the effort you have to put into getting this kind of material ready to write.
This original content is out of the ordinary. I appreciate that you’ve gone off the beaten path with your points and I agree with most.
Most people think they can write, but you are a true writer. You have put together valuable information in a way that’s easy for the reader to read and digest.